Seeing is believing
Huson Salm
RB Article
October 26, 2013
Under the banner of Nobel Laureate, hegemonic attitude of Suu Kyi was clearly known by her interview with BBC reporter on Thursday, October 24 2013.
As a matter of fact, she has been trying and lobbying since 2012 to reform the 2008 constitution, which was drafted by the then SLORC and SPDC military backed government.
The power hungry Suu Kyi, wants to be president of the state in the 2015 election. She has been profoundly trying to organize the entire national races in line with Suu Kyi.
In reality, the 2008 constitution is totally unreasonable, bias and unjust.
She had been in a foreign country until 1988. She became a overnight heroin in 1988 chaos under the shadow of Bogyoke Aung San. She never did anything good for the sake of the country. In fact, she might not have had chance to do it.
When she was in house arrest for many years, the entire world had been crying out for her release. This because the whole universe thought that it was totally unjust. It took the constant effort of the universe to free her. She was released shortly after the 2010 election. It was good for entire world community because people around the world consider her as magnetic, fantastic, kind, intellectual, and heroic. Broad minded and smart in social and political setting.
Seeing this by the universe, she had been awarded varieties of prizes from around the world including Muslims world.
May be she is good for herself but right now she has been seen more as ignorant, pathetic, ascendancy, selfish, fanatic, reserved, ill-mannered, jingoistic and xenophobic and so on.
During her arrest, the Rohingyas refugees living in Bangladesh heartedly prayed for her urgent release just because Rohingyas love Bogyoke Aung San and Suu Kyi, being the daughter of Aung San. Not because of any political gaining and also the Rohingya refugees felt that they would only return while Suu Kyi was in power. What a great love of Rohingyas refugees.
People all around the world thought that she is too heroic, magnanimous, farsighted and upright in handling both social and political sides for local and international audiences.
Right now, after seeing and hearing her attitude in BBC interview, she is regarded as nothing more than a great greedy and selfish lady after occupying all the valuable prizes from around the world.
She is merely employing for her Buddhism and Bamar people alone rather than paying attention for multi-races and religious people of the country in line principle of as a Nobel Laureate.
Now her ill habit is widely known that she forgets that she has received a lot of prizes from the world community on ground of social activities.
Or she thinks that she doesn’t need to take care of the things subjected in regards Rohingyas, kaman and Burmese Muslims.
Or it seems that she thinks the inhumane and untold suffering of Rohingyas, Kaman and Burmese Muslims social affairs are regarded as trash and nonsense.
Or she thinks that she is now in the same attitude of Thein Sein government. Many small-minded parliamentarians, Rakhine terrorist leaders, terrorist Buddhists monks, and bigoted 88 generation so called student leaders.
It is crystal clear that she wants to be president of the state by the favor vote of majority Buddhists people and doesn’t need to take care of other ethnic people and that of their basic rights.
What did she learn in foreign country where she has lived for many years and even employed in so many UN agencies?
Being the Nobel Laureate and popular leader of a state, does she think that she can bully local Muslims and Muslims of the world with the coordination mechanism of extremist monk Wirathu, Rakhine terrorists and Buddhist terrorists locally?
Didn’t she understand the BBC reporter’s questions which were all in English? (Or) what else?
BBC reporter asked Daw Suu Kyi that Rohingyas and Muslims of Burma have been living as displaced persons in their location under the horrendous threat, fear and constant intimidation of Rakhine terrorists, Buddhist terrorists and authorities. In that question, Suu Kyi has answered that there have been many Buddhist people left Myanmar for foreign countries for the past fifty years. The answer was very clear by Suu Kyi, there are many Myanmar Buddhists living in Thailand where she had already paid visit. She promised them return back to Myanmar while she is in power. There are also many Rohingya people living in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Malaysia and so on, as refugees who had to suffer the brunt of miseries & affliction, having to flee to foreign countries for more than fifty years. Then what about their status to return back to their native land? This was irrelevant answer paid by Suu Kyi, why was that? BBC reporter wanted to know from her (Daw Suu Kyi) tongue that If Suu Kyi would say “there are no Buddhist displaced persons like Rohingyas, Kaman and Burmese Muslims in swamp wetlands and flimsy tents because of the violence happened in Myanmar. But she twisted the answer dishonestly.
Does she think people from the world are naive? People around the world are not the students in her primary school nor are they naïve.
And while BBC reporter asked the question …what about Muslims of Burma living in under the constant intimidation and in fear? Suu Kyi answered that all the violence had been under the base of fear in grass-root levels and because of there are greater global Muslim power. What an irresponsible answer by the prominent leader of a state and a novel prize winner, what a shame for her and for the state.
Global Muslim power? What is that? What is the concern of global Muslims power and local Buddhist terrorists inhuman one-sided torture and killing on innocent Rohingyas, Kaman and Muslims of Burma? If so, she, as a Nobel winner, can she prove that global Muslim power has any role on local Muslims to bully on Arakan state or propel Burma through international investigation? What a bullshit intellectual behavior and bogus idea!
Does global Muslim power mean the peaceful demonstrations which have been all along the countries by global community not to punish, kill, torch, evict and so on against helpless Muslims of Myanmar? Isn't it fair? If not what about her? The same demonstration had been done by the global community until Daw Suu Kyi was released.
Or, was it an inner scheme of all Myanmar coordinated politicians to crack down on Muslims. A preempted action by the fanatic Buddhists before into an effect of global Muslims power in 21st century? People never thought global Muslim power, local Muslim and Buddhist clashes. Daw Suu Kyi had many time uttered that there would not be any occupied power in 21st century. What happened to her now? What if she becomes a little crazy?
If such violence were spiritually supported to happen to minority Muslims under the pretext of global Muslim power to take prior action on helpless people by majority of Buddhist Myanmar, then there would be more or less clashes in the future, in this land by the help of Daw Suu Kyi’s inspiration and different political icons. The truth is Daw Suu Kyi should be most wanted culprit in the past clashes, dead, casualties, destruction, loss of lives and livelihood of Rohingyas and Muslims of Burma in accordance to her way of answering to the BBC reporter.
As more, her position of easy going attitude and keeping quiet about the violence in Rakhine state and proper Burma has proved that she has been susceptible into guilty crime against humanity.
Why doesn't she agree the facts finding of international bodies of HRW and international human rights commissioner, Thomas Ojea Quintana? If so, Suu Kyi doesn't deserve to win Nobel prize and that of the attribute which she has been receiving from every corner of the world.
Right now, the onus is on international community to save Rohingyas and Muslims of Myanmar from her more open dangerous attitude.. The sooner the better.
It is crystal clear that she wants to be president of the state by the favor vote of majority Buddhists people and doesn’t need to take care of other ethnic people and that of their basic rights.
What did she learn in foreign country where she has lived for many years and even employed in so many UN agencies?
Being the Nobel Laureate and popular leader of a state, does she think that she can bully local Muslims and Muslims of the world with the coordination mechanism of extremist monk Wirathu, Rakhine terrorists and Buddhist terrorists locally?
Didn’t she understand the BBC reporter’s questions which were all in English? (Or) what else?
BBC reporter asked Daw Suu Kyi that Rohingyas and Muslims of Burma have been living as displaced persons in their location under the horrendous threat, fear and constant intimidation of Rakhine terrorists, Buddhist terrorists and authorities. In that question, Suu Kyi has answered that there have been many Buddhist people left Myanmar for foreign countries for the past fifty years. The answer was very clear by Suu Kyi, there are many Myanmar Buddhists living in Thailand where she had already paid visit. She promised them return back to Myanmar while she is in power. There are also many Rohingya people living in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Malaysia and so on, as refugees who had to suffer the brunt of miseries & affliction, having to flee to foreign countries for more than fifty years. Then what about their status to return back to their native land? This was irrelevant answer paid by Suu Kyi, why was that? BBC reporter wanted to know from her (Daw Suu Kyi) tongue that If Suu Kyi would say “there are no Buddhist displaced persons like Rohingyas, Kaman and Burmese Muslims in swamp wetlands and flimsy tents because of the violence happened in Myanmar. But she twisted the answer dishonestly.
Does she think people from the world are naive? People around the world are not the students in her primary school nor are they naïve.
And while BBC reporter asked the question …what about Muslims of Burma living in under the constant intimidation and in fear? Suu Kyi answered that all the violence had been under the base of fear in grass-root levels and because of there are greater global Muslim power. What an irresponsible answer by the prominent leader of a state and a novel prize winner, what a shame for her and for the state.
Global Muslim power? What is that? What is the concern of global Muslims power and local Buddhist terrorists inhuman one-sided torture and killing on innocent Rohingyas, Kaman and Muslims of Burma? If so, she, as a Nobel winner, can she prove that global Muslim power has any role on local Muslims to bully on Arakan state or propel Burma through international investigation? What a bullshit intellectual behavior and bogus idea!
Does global Muslim power mean the peaceful demonstrations which have been all along the countries by global community not to punish, kill, torch, evict and so on against helpless Muslims of Myanmar? Isn't it fair? If not what about her? The same demonstration had been done by the global community until Daw Suu Kyi was released.
Or, was it an inner scheme of all Myanmar coordinated politicians to crack down on Muslims. A preempted action by the fanatic Buddhists before into an effect of global Muslims power in 21st century? People never thought global Muslim power, local Muslim and Buddhist clashes. Daw Suu Kyi had many time uttered that there would not be any occupied power in 21st century. What happened to her now? What if she becomes a little crazy?
If such violence were spiritually supported to happen to minority Muslims under the pretext of global Muslim power to take prior action on helpless people by majority of Buddhist Myanmar, then there would be more or less clashes in the future, in this land by the help of Daw Suu Kyi’s inspiration and different political icons. The truth is Daw Suu Kyi should be most wanted culprit in the past clashes, dead, casualties, destruction, loss of lives and livelihood of Rohingyas and Muslims of Burma in accordance to her way of answering to the BBC reporter.
As more, her position of easy going attitude and keeping quiet about the violence in Rakhine state and proper Burma has proved that she has been susceptible into guilty crime against humanity.
Why doesn't she agree the facts finding of international bodies of HRW and international human rights commissioner, Thomas Ojea Quintana? If so, Suu Kyi doesn't deserve to win Nobel prize and that of the attribute which she has been receiving from every corner of the world.
Right now, the onus is on international community to save Rohingyas and Muslims of Myanmar from her more open dangerous attitude.. The sooner the better.
Exactly right for muslim people in Burma. Nobody will stand for human rights of Muslim minority in Burma. We will stand and fight for our rights by ourselves. Please try to united and fight for our rights.